Since you're one of the posters in this thread I take it you don't
believe anything you say?

Tony

wrote:
> It was with a growing sence of disbelief that I read the entire 266
> messages in this single thread. Having begun reading RAH to gain some
> insight on homebuilts - I would hesitate to give any credence at all to
> anything ANY of the posters on this thread have said.
>
> Recognizing that for some reason flame wars begin on these forums, I
> still have to say that I have NEVER, on any other forum, had the
> opportunity to read such childish drivel from so many different posters
> on subjects that are so far from the topic of the forum or even of the
> thread itself.
>
> If you don't like a particular poster or don't believe what he says -
> either don't read it or put that poster in your ignore bin and move on.
> I assume that the majority of you actually believe that you are adults
> - try acting like it then.
>
> By-the-by, in the for what it's worth column - the Navy (and at the
> time, the Marine Corps as a department of the Navy) do not give Good
> Conduct Medals every three years as the Air Force and Army do, they
> give them every 4 years. I could speculate that the reasoning is that
> the Air Force and Army can't expect their personnel to behave for 4
> years so they shortened the time to 3 years - a conclusion easily
> supported by what I have seen here - but I suspect that would only lead
> to another childish attack.
>
> Jay
>

Spock says to Norman:

"I am lying"


"Anthony W" > wrote in message
news:Ew8nh.1476$5g.1384@trndny01...
> Since you're one of the posters in this thread I take it you don't believe
> anything you say?
>
> Tony
>
> wrote:
>> It was with a growing sence of disbelief that I read the entire 266
>> messages in this single thread. Having begun reading RAH to gain some
>> insight on homebuilts - I would hesitate to give any credence at all to
>> anything ANY of the posters on this thread have said.
>>
>> Recognizing that for some reason flame wars begin on these forums, I
>> still have to say that I have NEVER, on any other forum, had the
>> opportunity to read such childish drivel from so many different posters
>> on subjects that are so far from the topic of the forum or even of the
>> thread itself.
>>
>> If you don't like a particular poster or don't believe what he says -
>> either don't read it or put that poster in your ignore bin and move on.
>> I assume that the majority of you actually believe that you are adults
>> - try acting like it then.
>>
>> By-the-by, in the for what it's worth column - the Navy (and at the
>> time, the Marine Corps as a department of the Navy) do not give Good
>> Conduct Medals every three years as the Air Force and Army do, they
>> give them every 4 years. I could speculate that the reasoning is that
>> the Air Force and Army can't expect their personnel to behave for 4
>> years so they shortened the time to 3 years - a conclusion easily
>> supported by what I have seen here - but I suspect that would only lead
>> to another childish attack.
>>
>> Jay
>>

Jay,

I can't help but laugh at your post. If you found it so childish as
you claimed, why did you bother to read ALL 266 messages? Even that
was not enough, you had to add your own childish response by taking a
dig at the Army and Air Force. Glad to see you could rise above the
childish drivel and add something of value to the contributions of
others. <BG>


wrote:
> It was with a growing sence of disbelief that I read the entire 266
> messages in this single thread. Having begun reading RAH to gain some
> insight on homebuilts - I would hesitate to give any credence at all to
> anything ANY of the posters on this thread have said.
>
> Recognizing that for some reason flame wars begin on these forums, I
> still have to say that I have NEVER, on any other forum, had the
> opportunity to read such childish drivel from so many different posters
> on subjects that are so far from the topic of the forum or even of the
> thread itself.
>
> If you don't like a particular poster or don't believe what he says -
> either don't read it or put that poster in your ignore bin and move on.
> I assume that the majority of you actually believe that you are adults
> - try acting like it then.
>
> By-the-by, in the for what it's worth column - the Navy (and at the
> time, the Marine Corps as a department of the Navy) do not give Good
> Conduct Medals every three years as the Air Force and Army do, they
> give them every 4 years. I could speculate that the reasoning is that
> the Air Force and Army can't expect their personnel to behave for 4
> years so they shortened the time to 3 years - a conclusion easily
> supported by what I have seen here - but I suspect that would only lead
> to another childish attack.
>
> Jay

wrote)
> It was with a growing sence of disbelief that I read the entire 266
> messages in this single thread. Having begun reading RAH to gain some
> insight on homebuilts - I would hesitate to give any credence at all to
> anything ANY of the posters on this thread have said.


A. You say you don't like the playground games, then you 'smear' the group.

B. Check out the new Mini 500 thread - you ain't seen nothin' yet. <g>

C. Start a fresh thread about a homebuilt that interests you. Ask a
question, share an opinion, post a link, start a conversation.

D. Understand, the regulars at RAH are about safety. All things that take
away from safety come under the scrutiny of the group - "credibility" being
one of those things.

E. See (C)


Montblack
Cri-Cri fan
http://www.flight.cz/cricri/english/

"Montblack" > wrote in message
>
>

> B. Check out the new Mini 500 thread - you ain't seen nothin' yet. <g>
>

Guess you called that one <g>

"Montblack" > wrote in message
>
>

> B. Check out the new Mini 500 thread - you ain't seen nothin' yet. <g>
>

Guess you called that one <g>

> wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> It was with a growing sence of disbelief that I read the entire 266
> messages in this single thread. Having begun reading RAH to gain some
> insight on homebuilts - I would hesitate to give any credence at all to
> anything ANY of the posters on this thread have said.
>

There is a tremendous amount of history between the characters involved.
There is a lot of flaming, but if you had been the subject of the attacks,
you would understand more, and just get out of the way until it blows itself
out.

> Recognizing that for some reason flame wars begin on these forums, I
> still have to say that I have NEVER, on any other forum, had the
> opportunity to read such childish drivel from so many different posters
> on subjects that are so far from the topic of the forum or even of the
> thread itself.

This cycle goes on ever 6 to 16 months. Just ignore it, and put the zzzzz
filter on to get rid of the thread. If you want to understand, someone has
a history of the problems, but it will take a bit of reading to get through
it all.

Can anyone provide the links I am talking about?
--
Jim in NC

"BobR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> Well, well, aren't you just the special one? You finally admit in a
> round about way that you are nothing more than a attention seeking liar
> and pat yourself on the back because you got me to respond to you.

Yap, yap, yapping away, Chimichanga? Did ya like the video? :)

<mercy snip> :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
>
> Nope. I called the Cherry Point public information office and asked
> it an incident like the one you describe would be in their files after
> 25 years. The answer, after a long silence, was no.

More excuses, Riley. I told you where you would find it, and I never said it
was the Cherry Point public info office?

Aren't you paying attention? :)

<mercy snip>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
>
> Me thinks the person lacking the testicular fortitude of his convictions
> is
> jaun....

....sez the dip**** who's been claiming for years he's getting his quacks in
a row. LOL! :)




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"BobR" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> Clearly, Jaun thinks its both clever and funny to post lies about
> people in order to "Yank their Chain".

You learned that long before I did, Chimichanga. I told you, you choke every
single time someone forcefeeds you your own bull****.

Didya watch the video or not? :)




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Morgans wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ups.com...
>> It was with a growing sence of disbelief that I read the entire 266
>> messages in this single thread. Having begun reading RAH to gain some
>> insight on homebuilts - I would hesitate to give any credence at all to
>> anything ANY of the posters on this thread have said.
>>
>
> There is a tremendous amount of history between the characters involved.
> There is a lot of flaming, but if you had been the subject of the attacks,
> you would understand more, and just get out of the way until it blows itself
> out.
>
>> Recognizing that for some reason flame wars begin on these forums, I
>> still have to say that I have NEVER, on any other forum, had the
>> opportunity to read such childish drivel from so many different posters
>> on subjects that are so far from the topic of the forum or even of the
>> thread itself.
>
> This cycle goes on ever 6 to 16 months. Just ignore it, and put the zzzzz
> filter on to get rid of the thread. If you want to understand, someone has
> a history of the problems, but it will take a bit of reading to get through
> it all.
>
> Can anyone provide the links I am talking about?

http://www.ousterhout.net/zoom.html

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"anon" > wrote in message
m...
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> ...
>> You don't need anyone to sign a DA-1800 to find out that the squadron had
>> a medevac mission and took a mom and her preemie to the hospital, or to
>> inquire about events related to that mission. All you need is to have
>> enough brain matter to send a FOIA request.
>
> When it comes to personnel records, FOIA records are very limited.

Of course it is, that's why I told ya, the info you seek is available
otherwise, but you just don't have cojones to follow up on your own BS, just
like you don't have the self-respect necessary to post in your own name,
rather than hide like a ****ant coward...




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Not even close. Bring some more quarters the next time. :)

"Scott" > wrote in message
.. .
> Wait a minute...could this be hero? The job description sounds like it
> might fit...
>
>
> http://search.netscape.com/ns/boomframe.jsp?query=JIMENEZ%2C+JUAN+CARLOS&page=1&offset=0&result_url=redir%3Fsrc%3Dwebsearch%26requestId%3De 4c07e7c23c5739f%26clickedItemRank%3D7%26userQuery% 3DJIMENEZ%252C%2BJUAN%2BCARLOS%26clickedItemURN%3D http%253A%252F%252Fimdb.com%252FName%253FJimenez%2 52C%252BJuan%252BCarlos%26invocationType%3D-%26fromPage%3DNSCPToolbarNS%26amp%3BampTest%3D1&remove_url=http%3A%2F%2Fimdb.com%2FName%253FJimene z%2C%252BJuan%252BCarlos
>
>
>
> Scott wrote:
>
>> I asked him what I was supposed to get out of the article on the Cherry
>> Point website and he just basically called me stupid for "not getting it"
>> and said I probably never would. Well, he was right about that...I DON'T
>> get what is so f***ing important about it. I read it (after he gave me a
>> good link to the article). All I saw was a mention that he fixed an APU
>> wire. So, his job title was obviously APU Fixer Upper. I still don't
>> get why he challenged to rah group to "look at the article if we have the
>> balls." Huh? What amount of balls does it take to read the article? He
>> just quit answering my several pleas asking just WHAT I was supposed to
>> take away from the table by reading the article, so I guess it just isn't
>> important enough for him to waste his time telling me what was so
>> important about what he did. I fixed MANY wires in my illustrious 3 year
>> and 2 month career in the USAF. To save Juanita the trouble of asking
>> why I didn't do the full 4 years, here it is. Graham-Rudmann, circa 1988.
>> Look it up.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> anon wrote:
>>
>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> You don't need anyone to sign a DA-1800 to find out that the squadron
>>>> had a medevac mission and took a mom and her preemie to the hospital,
>>>> or to inquire about events related to that mission. All you need is to
>>>> have enough brain matter to send a FOIA request.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> When it comes to personnel records, FOIA records are very limited. Did
>>> you want us to take a look at your military career, or did you just want
>>> us to find evidence of this one, rather routine, career-definin event?
>>>
>>> You are very specific in your demand that we look at someone's comments.
>>> What document were you referring to?
>>>
>>> Why don't you help us out in our efforts. Coward.
>>>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Scott" > wrote in message
.. .
> La Mona Jiménez
> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
> Jump to: navigation, search
>
> Juan Carlos Jiménez Rufino (born January 11, 1951), known as La Mona
> Jiménez) is arguably the most popular cuarteto singer that has ever lived.
> He was born in Córdoba, Argentina.

And even though I've been to Cordoba (to ferry a Stinson 108 names
"Aguilucho" for a friend to the airport in Buenos Aires where the local EAA
chapter is located) that's about 4,000 miles from where I was born, kiddo.
Sorry to burst your bubble. :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"ChuckSlusarczyk" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, Scott says...
> wrote:
>
>>> When it comes to personnel records, FOIA records are very limited. Did
>>> you
>>> want us to take a look at your military career, or did you just want us
>>> to
>>> find evidence of this one, rather routine, career-definin event?
>>>
>>> You are very specific in your demand that we look at someone's comments.
>>> What document were you referring to?
>>>
>>> Why don't you help us out in our efforts. Coward.
>>>
>>>
>
> He's scared you guys are getting to the truth.

LOL! Did you forget to take your meds? :)




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

> wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> It was with a growing sence of disbelief that I read the entire 266
> messages in this single thread. Having begun reading RAH to gain some
> insight on homebuilts - I would hesitate to give any credence at all to
> anything ANY of the posters on this thread have said.

Dude, it's entertainment. Think of it as a puppet show, with Chuck and his
puppets hanging from the ends of strings attacked to popsicle sticks. :)

> Recognizing that for some reason flame wars begin on these forums, I
> still have to say that I have NEVER, on any other forum, had the
> opportunity to read such childish drivel from so many different posters
> on subjects that are so far from the topic of the forum or even of the
> thread itself.
>
> If you don't like a particular poster or don't believe what he says -
> either don't read it or put that poster in your ignore bin and move on.
> I assume that the majority of you actually believe that you are adults
> - try acting like it then.
>
> By-the-by, in the for what it's worth column - the Navy (and at the
> time, the Marine Corps as a department of the Navy) do not give Good
> Conduct Medals every three years as the Air Force and Army do, they
> give them every 4 years. I could speculate that the reasoning is that
> the Air Force and Army can't expect their personnel to behave for 4
> years so they shortened the time to 3 years - a conclusion easily
> supported by what I have seen here - but I suspect that would only lead
> to another childish attack.
>
> Jay

Ooo! That must really hurt the feelings of the rahgagglers. :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"BobR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> I can't help but laugh at your post. If you found it so childish as
> you claimed, why did you bother to read ALL 266 messages? Even that
> was not enough, you had to add your own childish response by taking a
> dig at the Army and Air Force. Glad to see you could rise above the
> childish drivel and add something of value to the contributions of
> others. <BG>

Ooo, Chimichanga found someone else to yap at. :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Montblack" > wrote in message
...
>
> B. Check out the new Mini 500 thread - you ain't seen nothin' yet. <g>

In that we solidly agree. _That_ thread puts any of these circus threads to
shame. :)




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"anon" > wrote in message
m...
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Did you send them a picture of your daddy too? :)
>
>
> I will tell you something about my father. He told me that given time,
> everyone's true character will be revealed. Your character is well
> established.

Didn't he also tell you that a man's character is revealed much quicker by
the size of the yellow stripe? Look in the mirror. :)

> Juan, you make an issue of my anonymity. I ask you this question. How
> is it that an anonymous poster on RAH gets more respect from his audience
> than a former Marine? Ask yourself. You are a clown.

LOL! You think that's respect? <grin> Ever wonder what people say about you
behind your back? :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Yap, yap, yapping away? Yes, I would say that describes you pretty
well...with 280 posts in this thread almost 100 of them are from YOU!
Now who is yapping and who's chain got yanked? You yap at me, you yap
at Dan, you yap at chuck, you yap at everyone and they are all
laughing.

HA HA HA HA HA HA here's laughing AT YOU!

Bye now, you can have all the last words you want to now, I have proven
you to be a liar and that about makes job complete. I can return to
ignoring you again.

HA HA HA HA HA HA still laughing AT YOU!


Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "BobR" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
> > Well, well, aren't you just the special one? You finally admit in a
> > round about way that you are nothing more than a attention seeking liar
> > and pat yourself on the back because you got me to respond to you.
>
> Yap, yap, yapping away, Chimichanga? Did ya like the video? :)
>
> <mercy snip> :)
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"BobR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> Yap, yap, yapping away?

Yes, Chimichanga, that's about all you know how to do. Bye now indeed. Back
under your rock, twit. Shoo. :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Damn! I thought I had you pegged....

Scott




Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Not even close. Bring some more quarters the next time. :)
>
> "Scott" > wrote in message
> .. .
>
>>Wait a minute...could this be hero? The job description sounds like it
>>might fit...
>>
>>
>>http://search.netscape.com/ns/boomframe.jsp?query=JIMENEZ%2C+JUAN+CARLOS&page=1&offset=0&result_url=redir%3Fsrc%3Dwebsearch%26requestId%3De 4c07e7c23c5739f%26clickedItemRank%3D7%26userQuery% 3DJIMENEZ%252C%2BJUAN%2BCARLOS%26clickedItemURN%3D http%253A%252F%252Fimdb.com%252FName%253FJimenez%2 52C%252BJuan%252BCarlos%26invocationType%3D-%26fromPage%3DNSCPToolbarNS%26amp%3BampTest%3D1&remove_url=http%3A%2F%2Fimdb.com%2FName%253FJimene z%2C%252BJuan%252BCarlos
>>
>>
>>
>>Scott wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I asked him what I was supposed to get out of the article on the Cherry
>>>Point website and he just basically called me stupid for "not getting it"
>>>and said I probably never would. Well, he was right about that...I DON'T
>>>get what is so f***ing important about it. I read it (after he gave me a
>>>good link to the article). All I saw was a mention that he fixed an APU
>>>wire. So, his job title was obviously APU Fixer Upper. I still don't
>>>get why he challenged to rah group to "look at the article if we have the
>>>balls." Huh? What amount of balls does it take to read the article? He
>>>just quit answering my several pleas asking just WHAT I was supposed to
>>>take away from the table by reading the article, so I guess it just isn't
>>>important enough for him to waste his time telling me what was so
>>>important about what he did. I fixed MANY wires in my illustrious 3 year
>>>and 2 month career in the USAF. To save Juanita the trouble of asking
>>>why I didn't do the full 4 years, here it is. Graham-Rudmann, circa 1988.
>>>Look it up.
>>>
>>>Scott
>>>
>>>anon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>You don't need anyone to sign a DA-1800 to find out that the squadron
>>>>>had a medevac mission and took a mom and her preemie to the hospital,
>>>>>or to inquire about events related to that mission. All you need is to
>>>>>have enough brain matter to send a FOIA request.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>When it comes to personnel records, FOIA records are very limited. Did
>>>>you want us to take a look at your military career, or did you just want
>>>>us to find evidence of this one, rather routine, career-definin event?
>>>>
>>>>You are very specific in your demand that we look at someone's comments.
>>>>What document were you referring to?
>>>>
>>>>Why don't you help us out in our efforts. Coward.
>>>>
>
>
>
>

Scott,

You must realize that Jaun always has to have the last word. That is
the reason he just posted 13 different posts responding to everyone of
the individual threads. When he runs out of anything else, he just
posts some childish bull**** and keeps on going. Thats how the moron
managed to post more than three hundred posts last month and over 400
the month before. The poor guy must not have much else to do than read
and post to the newsgroups. Let him have the LAST post and this long
winded thread will end.

Scott wrote:
> Damn! I thought I had you pegged....
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
> > Not even close. Bring some more quarters the next time. :)
> >
> > "Scott" > wrote in message
> > .. .
> >
> >>Wait a minute...could this be hero? The job description sounds like it
> >>might fit...
> >>
> >>
> >>http://search.netscape.com/ns/boomframe.jsp?query=JIMENEZ%2C+JUAN+CARLOS&page=1&offset=0&result_url=redir%3Fsrc%3Dwebsearch%26requestId%3De 4c07e7c23c5739f%26clickedItemRank%3D7%26userQuery% 3DJIMENEZ%252C%2BJUAN%2BCARLOS%26clickedItemURN%3D http%253A%252F%252Fimdb.com%252FName%253FJimenez%2 52C%252BJuan%252BCarlos%26invocationType%3D-%26fromPage%3DNSCPToolbarNS%26amp%3BampTest%3D1&remove_url=http%3A%2F%2Fimdb.com%2FName%253FJimene z%2C%252BJuan%252BCarlos
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Scott wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I asked him what I was supposed to get out of the article on the Cherry
> >>>Point website and he just basically called me stupid for "not getting it"
> >>>and said I probably never would. Well, he was right about that...I DON'T
> >>>get what is so f***ing important about it. I read it (after he gave me a
> >>>good link to the article). All I saw was a mention that he fixed an APU
> >>>wire. So, his job title was obviously APU Fixer Upper. I still don't
> >>>get why he challenged to rah group to "look at the article if we have the
> >>>balls." Huh? What amount of balls does it take to read the article? He
> >>>just quit answering my several pleas asking just WHAT I was supposed to
> >>>take away from the table by reading the article, so I guess it just isn't
> >>>important enough for him to waste his time telling me what was so
> >>>important about what he did. I fixed MANY wires in my illustrious 3 year
> >>>and 2 month career in the USAF. To save Juanita the trouble of asking
> >>>why I didn't do the full 4 years, here it is. Graham-Rudmann, circa 1988.
> >>>Look it up.
> >>>
> >>>Scott
> >>>
> >>>anon wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>You don't need anyone to sign a DA-1800 to find out that the squadron
> >>>>>had a medevac mission and took a mom and her preemie to the hospital,
> >>>>>or to inquire about events related to that mission. All you need is to
> >>>>>have enough brain matter to send a FOIA request.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>When it comes to personnel records, FOIA records are very limited. Did
> >>>>you want us to take a look at your military career, or did you just want
> >>>>us to find evidence of this one, rather routine, career-definin event?
> >>>>
> >>>>You are very specific in your demand that we look at someone's comments.
> >>>>What document were you referring to?
> >>>>
> >>>>Why don't you help us out in our efforts. Coward.
> >>>>
> >
> >
> >
> >

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
...
> LOL! You think that's respect? <grin> Ever wonder what people say about
> you behind your back? :)

Do I wonder what people say about me behind my back?

Not to any great extent. I'm truthful and sincere, everything else pretty
much works out on its own. Those that are close to me are in the best
position to evaluate my character based on my words and actions. To those
that are not well positioned to evaluate my character, I don't go out of my
way to shape to their opinions. Over time, most folks will figure it out.

You are probably a good husband, father, and neighbor. Unfortunately,
something consistently gets lost in translation when you speak to an
Internet audience. Maybe, things that are intended to entertain or
educate, come off as boastful or arrogant - or even beg belief. If that is
the case, you have to ask yourself why you are so misunderstood by so many
people. Is there a slight language barrier jet lag? I don't know, I'm
giving you the benefit of the doubt that you aren't as big an asshole as
many of us perceive.

Until you opened your mouth, most of us were poised to respect you for your
military service and accept that such service often includes sacrifice,
risk, pressure, and emotional reward for a job well done, a job that might
have saved lives or a job that might have helped a unit meets its
objectives.

You enter into dangerous territory when a recantation of your achievements
are expressed in terms of sacrifice, risk, the preservation of life. If
viewed as a boast in any way, the reader immediately thinks of those that
sacrificed more, risked more, and saved more lives, without any boasts.

Without minimizing the emotional fulfillment you experienced when you helped
that mother and child, I must say that many of us here on RAH would expect
nothing less from a Marine.

I have a couple of stories of similar gravity that I probably will never
describe in a forum like this because I am afraid of how such a telling
would be perceived. I guess my thought is that a lot of people would have
reacted in similar ways if they were placed in similar situations.

I guess if joe-blow were to tell the same story as you did, we would be a
little more passive. You were a Marine. We expect more of Marines.

"BobR" > wrote in message
ps.com...
>
> You must realize that Jaun always has to have the last word.

That's right, Chimichanga. Bye now indeed. :)




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"anon" > wrote in message
m...
>
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
> ...
>> LOL! You think that's respect? <grin> Ever wonder what people say about
>> you behind your back? :)
>
> Do I wonder what people say about me behind my back?
> Not to any great extent. I'm truthful and sincere...

> Those that are close to me are in the best position to evaluate my
> character based on my words and actions. To those that are not well
> positioned to evaluate my character, I don't go out of my way to shape to
> their opinions. Over time, most folks will figure it out.

That we have in common. Most folks who know me have already figured me out.

> You are probably a good husband, father, and neighbor. Unfortunately,
> something consistently gets lost in translation when you speak to an
> Internet audience.

Dangerous to make assumptions. I have been online since before most people
knew what a modem was. This usenet newsgroups contains an infinitesimal
fraction of my total participation on the Internet, before that on places
like the GEnie info service where I was a sysop and responsible for
maintenance of their Aladdin front end, and before that on Fido BBS'.

> Maybe, things that are intended to entertain or educate, come off as
> boastful or arrogant - or even beg belief. If that is the case, you have
> to ask yourself why you are so misunderstood by so many people.

So many? Kiddo, there are many 12 people here who think they "understand"
me. They keep trying to put me down, and don't realize that it is I who is
using them as entertainment. I've tried to repeat this many times, but it
seems to go in one ear and out the other -- I don't CARE what any of the
rahgagglers think about me or the things I've done, or the things they think
I haven't done. This is nothing but entertainment. It is literally how I
describe it -- yank the chain, watch the puppets dance.

> Is there a slight language barrier jet lag? I don't know, I'm giving you
> the benefit of the doubt that you aren't as big an asshole as many of us
> perceive.

Alright. If that is the case I may do the same for you. But not while you
continue to hide behind an anonymous posting name.

> You enter into dangerous territory when a recantation of your achievements
> are expressed in terms of sacrifice, risk, the preservation of life. If
> viewed as a boast in any way, the reader immediately thinks of those that
> sacrificed more, risked more, and saved more lives, without any boasts.

You're ignoring the beginning of the thread and the reason I posted that
small story. Go back and read it again.

> I guess if joe-blow were to tell the same story as you did, we would be a
> little more passive. You were a Marine. We expect more of Marines.

And you got much more. But you see, I don't need anyone to validate that for
me. I know what I did. That mom and that kid was just one day in a four year
career. It just happens to be something I'm proud of because it was lives
saved, rather than taken.




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez wrote:
<snip>
>
> And you got much more. But you see, I don't need anyone to validate that for
> me. I know what I did. That mom and that kid was just one day in a four year
> career. It just happens to be something I'm proud of because it was lives
> saved, rather than taken.

As if you have been anywhere near combat.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
> <snip>
>>
>> And you got much more. But you see, I don't need anyone to validate that
>> for me. I know what I did. That mom and that kid was just one day in a
>> four year career. It just happens to be something I'm proud of because it
>> was lives saved, rather than taken.
>
> As if you have been anywhere near combat.

As opposed to what, being near the mess hall, like you? :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> And you got much more. But you see, I don't need anyone to validate that
>>> for me. I know what I did. That mom and that kid was just one day in a
>>> four year career. It just happens to be something I'm proud of because it
>>> was lives saved, rather than taken.
>> As if you have been anywhere near combat.
>
> As opposed to what, being near the mess hall, like you? :)
>
>
>
Chow halls were handy dandy places to eat so I was frequently near
and IN them in my military career. Between my Army time and my Air Force
time I have a lot more combat experience than you ever fantasized about.

Now tell us why the U.S.M.C. declined awarding you a Good Conduct Medal.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>> And you got much more. But you see, I don't need anyone to validate
>>>> that for me. I know what I did. That mom and that kid was just one day
>>>> in a four year career. It just happens to be something I'm proud of
>>>> because it was lives saved, rather than taken.
>>> As if you have been anywhere near combat.
>>
>> As opposed to what, being near the mess hall, like you? :)
> Chow halls were handy dandy places to eat so I was frequently near and
> IN them in my military career. Between my Army time and my Air Force time
> I have a lot more combat experience than you ever fantasized about.
>
> Now tell us why the U.S.M.C. declined awarding you a Good Conduct Medal.

Because I beat the crap out of flyboys like you. :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Juan Jimenez wrote:
> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>> And you got much more. But you see, I don't need anyone to validate
>>>>> that for me. I know what I did. That mom and that kid was just one day
>>>>> in a four year career. It just happens to be something I'm proud of
>>>>> because it was lives saved, rather than taken.
>>>> As if you have been anywhere near combat.
>>> As opposed to what, being near the mess hall, like you? :)
>> Chow halls were handy dandy places to eat so I was frequently near and
>> IN them in my military career. Between my Army time and my Air Force time
>> I have a lot more combat experience than you ever fantasized about.
>>
>> Now tell us why the U.S.M.C. declined awarding you a Good Conduct Medal.
>
> Because I beat the crap out of flyboys like you. :)
>
>
More like substandard performance and appearance.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Juan Jimenez wrote:

> Because I beat the crap out of flyboys like you. :)

More like the fact he got the crap beaten out of him by the Girl
Scouts...

"That does not look good on a resume!"

~ Robin Williams, from Good Morning Vietnam

DABEAR wrote:
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> Because I beat the crap out of flyboys like you. :)
>
> More like the fact he got the crap beaten out of him by the Girl
> Scouts...
>

Couldn't have happened. If someone HAD beaten the crap out of him
there would be nothing left.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"Dan" > wrote in message
...
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>> "Dan" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>> And you got much more. But you see, I don't need anyone to validate
>>>>>> that for me. I know what I did. That mom and that kid was just one
>>>>>> day in a four year career. It just happens to be something I'm proud
>>>>>> of because it was lives saved, rather than taken.
>>>>> As if you have been anywhere near combat.
>>>> As opposed to what, being near the mess hall, like you? :)
>>> Chow halls were handy dandy places to eat so I was frequently near and
>>> IN them in my military career. Between my Army time and my Air Force
>>> time I have a lot more combat experience than you ever fantasized about.
>>>
>>> Now tell us why the U.S.M.C. declined awarding you a Good Conduct
>>> Medal.
>>
>> Because I beat the crap out of flyboys like you. :)
> More like substandard performance and appearance.

To each his own hallucinations. Don't forget to take your meds! :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"DABEAR" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Juan Jimenez wrote:
>
>> Because I beat the crap out of flyboys like you. :)
>
> More like the fact he got the crap beaten out of him by the Girl Scouts...

so what do you do to defend yourself from girl scouts, boy? Roll away? :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
:

>
> "anon" > wrote in message
> m...
>>
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Did you send them a picture of your daddy too? :)
>>
>>
>> I will tell you something about my father. He told me that given
>> time, everyone's true character will be revealed. Your character is
>> well established.
>
> Didn't he also tell you that a man's character is revealed much
> quicker by the size of the yellow stripe? Look in the mirror. :)
>
>> Juan, you make an issue of my anonymity. I ask you this question.
>> How is it that an anonymous poster on RAH gets more respect from his
>> audience than a former Marine? Ask yourself. You are a clown.
>
> LOL! You think that's respect? <grin> Ever wonder what people say
> about you behind your back? :)
>

obviously not something you'll ever have to worry about..

"Alphonse Le Creur." > wrote in message
.130...
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> "anon" > wrote in message
>> m...
>>>
>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Did you send them a picture of your daddy too? :)
>>>
>>>
>>> I will tell you something about my father. He told me that given
>>> time, everyone's true character will be revealed. Your character is
>>> well established.
>>
>> Didn't he also tell you that a man's character is revealed much
>> quicker by the size of the yellow stripe? Look in the mirror. :)
>>
>>> Juan, you make an issue of my anonymity. I ask you this question.
>>> How is it that an anonymous poster on RAH gets more respect from his
>>> audience than a former Marine? Ask yourself. You are a clown.
>>
>> LOL! You think that's respect? <grin> Ever wonder what people say
>> about you behind your back? :)
>
> obviously not something you'll ever have to worry about..

Precisely. I don't worry about what people say behind my back, because I
don't give any respect to anyone who won't say it to my face. :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45ae3d56$1$4847$88260bb3
@free.teranews.com:

>
> "Alphonse Le Creur." > wrote in message
> .130...
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>>
>>> "anon" > wrote in message
>>> m...
>>>>
>>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Did you send them a picture of your daddy too? :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I will tell you something about my father. He told me that given
>>>> time, everyone's true character will be revealed. Your character
is
>>>> well established.
>>>
>>> Didn't he also tell you that a man's character is revealed much
>>> quicker by the size of the yellow stripe? Look in the mirror. :)
>>>
>>>> Juan, you make an issue of my anonymity. I ask you this question.
>>>> How is it that an anonymous poster on RAH gets more respect from
his
>>>> audience than a former Marine? Ask yourself. You are a clown.
>>>
>>> LOL! You think that's respect? <grin> Ever wonder what people say
>>> about you behind your back? :)
>>
>> obviously not something you'll ever have to worry about..
>
> Precisely. I don't worry about what people say behind my back, because
I
> don't give any respect to anyone who won't say it to my face. :)


Actually, I've never seen you give anyone any respect at all..


But what I meant is nobody could possibly say anything worse about you
behind your back than what's said here.

Or, for that matter, what you actually think of yourself.




>
>
>

Richard Riley > wrote in
:

> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:51:18 -0400, "Juan Jimenez" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Alphonse Le Creur." > wrote in message
.130...
>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "anon" > wrote in message
>>>> m...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Did you send them a picture of your daddy too? :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I will tell you something about my father. He told me that given
>>>>> time, everyone's true character will be revealed. Your character
>>>>> is well established.
>>>>
>>>> Didn't he also tell you that a man's character is revealed much
>>>> quicker by the size of the yellow stripe? Look in the mirror. :)
>>>>
>>>>> Juan, you make an issue of my anonymity. I ask you this
>>>>> question. How is it that an anonymous poster on RAH gets more
>>>>> respect from his audience than a former Marine? Ask yourself.
>>>>> You are a clown.
>>>>
>>>> LOL! You think that's respect? <grin> Ever wonder what people say
>>>> about you behind your back? :)
>>>
>>> obviously not something you'll ever have to worry about..
>>
>>Precisely. I don't worry about what people say behind my back, because
>>I don't give any respect to anyone who won't say it to my face. :)
>
>
> Juan, I think he meant nobody bothers talking behind your back. Nobody
> actually wants your restpect, so it would make sense. The point is to
> poke you so they can make you splutter.

Bingo.

"Richard Riley" > wrote in message
...
>
> Juan, I think he meant nobody bothers talking behind your back.

That's the core of your problem, Richard. Trying to think. :)




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
.130...
>
> Actually, I've never seen you give anyone any respect at all..

Oh, how precious! Had I known you were looking I'd have given you an
autograph. <chuckle>




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45b0c29a$1$4843$88260bb3
@free.teranews.com:

>
> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
> .130...
>>
>> Actually, I've never seen you give anyone any respect at all..
>
> Oh, how precious! Had I known you were looking I'd have given you an
> autograph. <chuckle>


It must be extremely taxing to be such a boob...

"Alphinse Le Creur" > wrote in message
.130...
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45b0c29a$1$4843$88260bb3
> @free.teranews.com:
>
>>
>> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
>> .130...
>>>
>>> Actually, I've never seen you give anyone any respect at all..
>>
>> Oh, how precious! Had I known you were looking I'd have given you an
>> autograph. <chuckle>
>
>
> It must be extremely taxing to be such a boob...

I wouldn't know. What's your excuse? Personal experience?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45b6b306$0$24357$88260bb3
@free.teranews.com:

>
> "Alphinse Le Creur" > wrote in message
> .130...
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45b0c29a$1$4843
$88260bb3
>> @free.teranews.com:
>>
>>>
>>> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
>>> .130...
>>>>
>>>> Actually, I've never seen you give anyone any respect at all..
>>>
>>> Oh, how precious! Had I known you were looking I'd have given you an
>>> autograph. <chuckle>
>>
>>
>> It must be extremely taxing to be such a boob...
>
> I wouldn't know. What's your excuse? Personal experience?
>

Oh boy, an IKYABWAI response.




Still evading the issue though I see..

Why, exactly, can't you fly your own airplane, luser boy?

Alphonse Le Creur wrote:
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45b6b306$0$24357$88260bb3
> @free.teranews.com:
>
>> "Alphinse Le Creur" > wrote in message
>> .130...
>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45b0c29a$1$4843
> $88260bb3
>>> @free.teranews.com:
>>>
>>>> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
>>>> .130...
>>>>> Actually, I've never seen you give anyone any respect at all..
>>>> Oh, how precious! Had I known you were looking I'd have given you an
>>>> autograph. <chuckle>
>>>
>>> It must be extremely taxing to be such a boob...
>> I wouldn't know. What's your excuse? Personal experience?
>>
>
> Oh boy, an IKYABWAI response.
>
>
>
>
> Still evading the issue though I see..
>
> Why, exactly, can't you fly your own airplane, luser boy?
>
Yawn has said he never intended to fly the yawn dart. He wants to
profit by selling it. Since no one will buy it we can expect an
accidental fire or similar.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On Jan 25, 12:04 pm, Dan > wrote:
> Alphonse Le Creur wrote:
> > "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45b6b306$0$24357$88260bb3
> > @free.teranews.com:
>
> >> "Alphinse Le Creur" > wrote in message
> .130...
> >>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45b0c29a$1$4843
> > $88260bb3
> >>> @free.teranews.com:
>
> >>>> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
> .130...
> >>>>> Actually, I've never seen you give anyone any respect at all..
> >>>> Oh, how precious! Had I known you were looking I'd have given you an
> >>>> autograph. <chuckle>
>
> >>> It must be extremely taxing to be such a boob...
> >> I wouldn't know. What's your excuse? Personal experience?
>
> > Oh boy, an IKYABWAI response.
>
> > Still evading the issue though I see..
>
> > Why, exactly, can't you fly your own airplane, luser boy? Yawn has said he never intended to fly the yawn dart. He wants to
> profit by selling it. Since no one will buy it we can expect an
> accidental fire or similar.
>
> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -

Could be one of those friction type fires.Payment book rubbing
against the insurance policy.

Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring

wrote:
>
> On Jan 25, 12:04 pm, Dan > wrote:
>> Alphonse Le Creur wrote:
>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45b6b306$0$24357$88260bb3
>>> @free.teranews.com:
>>>> "Alphinse Le Creur" > wrote in message
>>>> .130...
>>>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45b0c29a$1$4843
>>> $88260bb3
>>>>> @free.teranews.com:
>>>>>> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
>>>>>> .130...
>>>>>>> Actually, I've never seen you give anyone any respect at all..
>>>>>> Oh, how precious! Had I known you were looking I'd have given you an
>>>>>> autograph. <chuckle>
>>>>> It must be extremely taxing to be such a boob...
>>>> I wouldn't know. What's your excuse? Personal experience?
>>> Oh boy, an IKYABWAI response.
>>> Still evading the issue though I see..
>>> Why, exactly, can't you fly your own airplane, luser boy? Yawn has said he never intended to fly the yawn dart. He wants to
>> profit by selling it. Since no one will buy it we can expect an
>> accidental fire or similar.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
>
> Could be one of those friction type fires.Payment book rubbing
> against the insurance policy.
>
> Frank M.Hitlaw on vacation in Sebring
>
And the report he files as a claim would be a work of friction.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

> wrote in message
ps.com...
>
>
> On Jan 25, 12:04 pm, Dan > wrote:
>> Alphonse Le Creur wrote:
>> > "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
>> > news:45b6b306$0$24357$88260bb3
>> > @free.teranews.com:
>>
>> >> "Alphinse Le Creur" > wrote in message
>> .130...
>> >>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45b0c29a$1$4843
>> > $88260bb3
>> >>> @free.teranews.com:
>>
>> >>>> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
>> .130...
>> >>>>> Actually, I've never seen you give anyone any respect at all..
>> >>>> Oh, how precious! Had I known you were looking I'd have given you an
>> >>>> autograph. <chuckle>
>>
>> >>> It must be extremely taxing to be such a boob...
>> >> I wouldn't know. What's your excuse? Personal experience?
>>
>> > Oh boy, an IKYABWAI response.
>>
>> > Still evading the issue though I see..
>>
>> > Why, exactly, can't you fly your own airplane, luser boy? Yawn has
>> > said he never intended to fly the yawn dart. He wants to
>> profit by selling it. Since no one will buy it we can expect an
>> accidental fire or similar.
>>
>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
>
> Could be one of those friction type fires.Payment book rubbing
> against the insurance policy.

Wow, another stupid statement from Ugly, and they keep racking up into a
pile. :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
:

>
> > wrote in message
> ps.com...
>>
>>
>> On Jan 25, 12:04 pm, Dan > wrote:
>>> Alphonse Le Creur wrote:
>>> > "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
>>> > news:45b6b306$0$24357$88260bb3
>>> > @free.teranews.com:
>>>
>>> >> "Alphinse Le Creur" > wrote in message
>>> .130...
>>> >>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in news:45b0c29a$1$4843
>>> > $88260bb3
>>> >>> @free.teranews.com:
>>>
>>> >>>> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
>>> .130...
>>> >>>>> Actually, I've never seen you give anyone any respect at all..
>>> >>>> Oh, how precious! Had I known you were looking I'd have given
>>> >>>> you an autograph. <chuckle>
>>>
>>> >>> It must be extremely taxing to be such a boob...
>>> >> I wouldn't know. What's your excuse? Personal experience?
>>>
>>> > Oh boy, an IKYABWAI response.
>>>
>>> > Still evading the issue though I see..
>>>
>>> > Why, exactly, can't you fly your own airplane, luser boy? Yawn
>>> > has said he never intended to fly the yawn dart. He wants to
>>> profit by selling it. Since no one will buy it we can expect an
>>> accidental fire or similar.
>>>
>>> Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
>>
>> Could be one of those friction type fires.Payment book rubbing
>> against the insurance policy.
>
> Wow, another stupid statement from Ugly, and they keep racking up into
> a pile. :)
>

Don';t be so hard on yourself. That's my job,

Oh, and a pre-emptive "Whoosh" as that one sails so far over your head
you couldn't catch it if even you could fly..

"Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
.130...
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
> :
>
>> Wow, another stupid statement from Ugly, and they keep racking up into
>> a pile. :)
>>
>
> Don';t be so hard on yourself. That's my job,
>
> Oh, and a pre-emptive "Whoosh" as that one sails so far over your head
> you couldn't catch it if even you could fly..

That was the sound of it going over your head, not mine. Given that fact, I
think I better not confuse you with the explanation. :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
:

>
> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
> .130...
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> Wow, another stupid statement from Ugly, and they keep racking up
>>> into a pile. :)
>>>
>>
>> Don';t be so hard on yourself. That's my job,
>>
>> Oh, and a pre-emptive "Whoosh" as that one sails so far over your
>> head you couldn't catch it if even you could fly..
>
> That was the sound of it going over your head, not mine. Given that
> fact, I think I better not confuse you with the explanation. :)

Ahh there we go, another IKYABWAI lame.


Well, as far as kooks go, you're not really up to my usual standard, but
you'll do as a chew toy for now..

"Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
.130...
> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
>> .130...
>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Wow, another stupid statement from Ugly, and they keep racking up
>>>> into a pile. :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Don';t be so hard on yourself. That's my job,
>>>
>>> Oh, and a pre-emptive "Whoosh" as that one sails so far over your
>>> head you couldn't catch it if even you could fly..
>>
>> That was the sound of it going over your head, not mine. Given that
>> fact, I think I better not confuse you with the explanation. :)
>
> Ahh there we go, another IKYABWAI lame.
>
> Well, as far as kooks go, you're not really up to my usual standard, but
> you'll do as a chew toy for now..

Given that I'm up here on the bar chair enjoying my JD and you're down there
with the sawdust chewing on... something.... whatever that is... I do
believe you're still hallucinating, but that's ok, enjoy! Fetch, boy! :)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
:

>
> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
> .130...
>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>>
>>> "Alphonse Le Creur" > wrote in message
>>> .130...
>>>> "Juan Jimenez" > wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Wow, another stupid statement from Ugly, and they keep racking up
>>>>> into a pile. :)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Don';t be so hard on yourself. That's my job,
>>>>
>>>> Oh, and a pre-emptive "Whoosh" as that one sails so far over your
>>>> head you couldn't catch it if even you could fly..
>>>
>>> That was the sound of it going over your head, not mine. Given that
>>> fact, I think I better not confuse you with the explanation. :)
>>
>> Ahh there we go, another IKYABWAI lame.
>>
>> Well, as far as kooks go, you're not really up to my usual standard,
>> but you'll do as a chew toy for now..
>
> Given that I'm up here on the bar chair enjoying my JD and you're down
> there with the sawdust chewing on... something.... whatever that is...
> I do believe you're still hallucinating, but that's ok, enjoy! Fetch,
> boy! :)
>


Not a problem, juannabeee.